We feel, as do all broadcasters, it is not for us to deem what is suitable viewing for a person. This should be the decision of the person or parent and not through any company dictation.
I think it unfair to label all broadcasters in this manner. Certainly with the advent of the Internet, place and time shifting of programmes, etc. it becomes very hard for broadcasters to dictate what is watched when, but there are still guidelines in place (ie the Watershed) even if these are being eroded.
Certainly there should be a high emphasis placed on parental responsibility but both "sides" should be working together to make it difficult for minors to access inappropriate material.
Further to this, card companies are now issuing, in large numbers, prepaid credit cards to children as young as 13... It has always been a mis-conception that if you have a credit card, you must be over the legal age of consent. Unfortunately this is not the case.
Actually it
is still the case. "Prepaid credit card" is a misnomer. These are NOT credit cards, they are prepay cards (they act in a similar way to a debit card, or to an electronic gift voucher card).
Legally, credit (in the true sense) is not available to any person under the age of 18.
It should be perfectly possible to identify from the first four or so digits which type of card is being used, and block those which can be issued to minors. I cannot believe a company supposedly as technically advanced as yourselves cannot find a way to work with the credit card / prepay card companies to work this out.
(See this
Wikipedia article on credit card numbers for the basics of what I mean)
If credit cards cannot be used for age verification, as you state, then why do so many other adult web sites use them as a form of verification? Are they all wrong?
In a bid to help promote internet viewing awareness to your readers, we would be happy to submit all our information for you to post as a separate link or information group. We are happy to supply the information as an anonymous unbranded link or as raw information, whichever is preferable.
I'm don't understand this paragraph. What is "internet viewing awareness" and what information do you have in relation to it? Why does it have to be anonymous and unbranded. Please could you clarify what exactly you mean by this?